theprinceobjects:

HG: Is the impulse to know alot, or is the impulse to copy things that strike you?

JMB: Well, originally I wanted to copy the whole history down, but it was too tedious so I just stuck to the cast of characters.

HG: So they’re kinds of indexes to encyclopedias that don’t exist.

JMB: I just like the names.


######## 


the names with which a subject surrounds itself are not indiscernable. But the external witness, noting that for the most part these names lack a referent inside the situation such as it is, considers that they make up an arbitrary and content-free language. Hence, any revolutionary politics is considered to maintain a utopian (or non-realistic) discourse; a scientific revolution is received with skepticism, or held to be an abstraction without a base in experiments; and lovers’ babble is dismissed as infantile foolishness by the wise. These witnesses, in a certain sense, are right. The names generated - or rather, composed - by a subject are suspended, with respect to their signification, from the “to-come” of a truth.






-an early discussion (from the January 1983 issue) between Basquiat and famed Metropolitan curator Henry Geldzahler.  from Interview magazine.
-badiou b.e. 398 

(via beingnothing)